<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Killing Them Hardly &#187; consumer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.killingthemhardly.com/category/consumer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.killingthemhardly.com</link>
	<description>shiny pebbles from the stream.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:46:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Revolutionary Grape.</title>
		<link>http://www.killingthemhardly.com/2010/07/revolutionary-grape/</link>
		<comments>http://www.killingthemhardly.com/2010/07/revolutionary-grape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vegetarian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killingthemhardly.com/?p=1190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My friend Tom Caestecker in Chicago recently wrote this piece about emerging wine trends for the examiner.com &#8211; check it out!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My friend Tom Caestecker in Chicago recently wrote <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-17983-Chicago-Budget-Wine-Examiner~y2010m6d28-For-the-4th-consider-revolutionary-American-wines" target="_blank">this piece</a> about emerging wine trends for the examiner.com &#8211; check it out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.killingthemhardly.com/2010/07/revolutionary-grape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mobile Brand Loyalty</title>
		<link>http://www.killingthemhardly.com/2010/06/mobile-brand-loyalty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.killingthemhardly.com/2010/06/mobile-brand-loyalty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 17:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interactive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user interface]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killingthemhardly.com/?p=1183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A survey by Piper Jaffray yesterday reveals that most early iPhone 4 buyers were upgrading from previous iPhones &#8212; and remaining loyal to Apple &#8212; and that very few were switching to AT&#38;T from other carriers. Specifically, here are highlights from Piper analyst Gene Munster&#8217;s note this morning: 77% of iPhone 4 buyers polled in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A survey by Piper Jaffray yesterday reveals that most early <a id="KonaLink0" href="http://www.businessinsider.com/wow-77-of-early-iphone-4-buyers-upgrading-from-old-iphones-2010-6#" target="undefined"><span style="color: #1d637d;">iPhone 4</span></a> buyers were upgrading from previous  iPhones &#8212; and remaining loyal to Apple &#8212; and that very few were  switching to AT&amp;T from other carriers.</p>
<p>Specifically, here are highlights from Piper analyst Gene Munster&#8217;s  note this morning:</p>
<ul>
<li>77% of <a id="KonaLink3" href="http://www.businessinsider.com/wow-77-of-early-iphone-4-buyers-upgrading-from-old-iphones-2010-6#" target="undefined"><span style="color: #1d637d;">iPhone</span></a> 4  buyers polled in three cities (San Francisco, New York, and Minneapolis)  were upgrading from old iPhones. That&#8217;s up from 56% last year and 38%  in 2008, and represents brand loyalty that is likely unmatched in the  mobile industry.</li>
<li>16% of buyers were switching to AT&amp;T from other carriers, down  from 28% last year. <a id="KonaLink1" href="http://www.businessinsider.com/wow-77-of-early-iphone-4-buyers-upgrading-from-old-iphones-2010-6#" target="undefined"><span style="color: #1d637d;">Apple</span></a> REALLY needs to add another carrier if it wants to maximize sales.  (Preferably Verizon Wireless, the nation&#8217;s biggest.)</li>
<li>54% purchased the $299 32 GB model, up from 43% who bought the 32 GB  <a id="KonaLink2" href="http://www.businessinsider.com/wow-77-of-early-iphone-4-buyers-upgrading-from-old-iphones-2010-6#" target="undefined"><span style="color: #1d637d;">iPhone 3GS</span></a> last year.</li>
<li>28% of iPhone 4 buyers owned an iPad, which confirms that the <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/my-excellent-six-hour-iphone-4-adventure-2010-6">people  waiting in line</a> were the most serious of the Apple fanatics. Of the  72% who did not own an iPad, 39% said they would probably buy one  within the next year, while 61% said they would not.</li>
<li>65% were Mac owners, down from 75% at the first iPhone launch in  2007.</li>
</ul>
<p>The takeaway: Apple has a reliable stable of devoted users who will  likely upgrade to the newest iPhone every year, assuming there&#8217;s nothing  better on the market.</p>
<div>Read more: <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/wow-77-of-early-iphone-4-buyers-upgrading-from-old-iphones-2010-6#ixzz0rt30ZVOl">http://www.businessinsider.com/wow-77-of-early-iphone-4-buyers-upgrading-from-old-iphones-2010-6#ixzz0rt30ZVOl</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.killingthemhardly.com/2010/06/mobile-brand-loyalty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hello Thelonius!</title>
		<link>http://www.killingthemhardly.com/2010/06/hello-thelonius/</link>
		<comments>http://www.killingthemhardly.com/2010/06/hello-thelonius/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[annunciation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interactive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killingthemhardly.com/?p=1163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pleased to say that this blog has been updated to WordPress 3 &#8211; &#8216;Thelonius&#8221;.  So far so good.  We&#8217;re going to get the Annunciation Interactive site updated soon as well.  From what I&#8217;m seeing, WP3 continues the evolution of WordPress toward a more general content manager versus its blog-centric roots&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.killingthemhardly.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/wordpress-logo.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1164" title="wordpress-logo" src="http://www.killingthemhardly.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/wordpress-logo.png" alt="" width="424" height="399" /></a></p>
<p>Pleased to say that this blog has been updated to WordPress 3 &#8211; &#8216;Thelonius&#8221;.  So far so good.  We&#8217;re going to get the <a href="http://www.annunciate.org">Annunciation Interactive</a> site updated soon as well.  From what I&#8217;m seeing, WP3 continues the evolution of WordPress toward a more general content manager versus its blog-centric roots&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.killingthemhardly.com/2010/06/hello-thelonius/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bionic Action.</title>
		<link>http://www.killingthemhardly.com/2010/06/bionic-action/</link>
		<comments>http://www.killingthemhardly.com/2010/06/bionic-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 15:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killingthemhardly.com/?p=1156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Found this online &#8211; a 1973 ad from Kenner &#8211; makers of the Six Million Dollar Man bionic action figure.  This, along with the Evel Knievel figure, was the bomb back in the day.  The ad was in heavy rotation in early to mid-Seventies Marvel comics.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.killingthemhardly.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/bionic.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-large wp-image-1157" title="bionic" src="http://www.killingthemhardly.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/bionic-396x585.jpg" alt="" width="396" height="585" /></a></p>
<p>Found this online &#8211; a 1973 ad from Kenner &#8211; makers of the Six Million Dollar Man bionic action figure.  This, along with the <a href="http://www.killingthemhardly.com/2007/12/r-i-p-evel/">Evel Knievel figure</a>, was the bomb back in the day.  The ad was in heavy rotation in early to mid-Seventies Marvel comics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.killingthemhardly.com/2010/06/bionic-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solar Surface Area.</title>
		<link>http://www.killingthemhardly.com/2010/06/solar-surface-area/</link>
		<comments>http://www.killingthemhardly.com/2010/06/solar-surface-area/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 14:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killingthemhardly.com/?p=1143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The attached infographic shows the surface area required for powering the Earth with solar panels alone.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.killingthemhardly.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/solar.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-large wp-image-1144" title="solar" src="http://www.killingthemhardly.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/solar-585x440.jpg" alt="" width="585" height="440" /></a></p>
<p>The attached infographic shows the surface area required for powering the Earth with solar panels alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.killingthemhardly.com/2010/06/solar-surface-area/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Look Upon My Works&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.killingthemhardly.com/2010/05/look-upon-my-works/</link>
		<comments>http://www.killingthemhardly.com/2010/05/look-upon-my-works/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 17:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killingthemhardly.com/?p=1134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apropos of nothing in particular, I really like this image found on Flickr.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.killingthemhardly.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/COOL_CAR.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1133" title="COOL_CAR" src="http://www.killingthemhardly.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/COOL_CAR.jpg" alt="" width="498" height="497" /></a></p>
<p>Apropos of nothing in particular, I really like this image found on Flickr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.killingthemhardly.com/2010/05/look-upon-my-works/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flash Wars.</title>
		<link>http://www.killingthemhardly.com/2010/05/flash-wars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.killingthemhardly.com/2010/05/flash-wars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 15:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[annunciation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interactive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pranks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killingthemhardly.com/?p=1115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kind of funny back &#38; forth this past week from Apple and Adobe.  Adobe apparently debuted a strange passive-aggressive &#8216;We Heart Apple&#8217; campaign &#8211; while conducting a flame war with Steve Jobs et al.  Apple&#8217;s (apparently fake) response is below.  Heh.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kind of funny back &amp; forth this past week from Apple and Adobe.  Adobe apparently debuted a strange passive-aggressive &#8216;We Heart Apple&#8217; campaign &#8211; while conducting a flame war with Steve Jobs et al.  Apple&#8217;s (apparently fake) response is below.  Heh.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.killingthemhardly.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/adobe_ad1.png"><img class="alignnone size-large wp-image-1116" title="adobe_ad1" src="http://www.killingthemhardly.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/adobe_ad1-585x309.jpg" alt="" width="585" height="309" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.killingthemhardly.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Apple_ad.png"><img class="alignnone size-large wp-image-1117" title="Apple_ad" src="http://www.killingthemhardly.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Apple_ad-585x391.png" alt="" width="585" height="391" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.killingthemhardly.com/2010/05/flash-wars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TrustoCorp Truth.</title>
		<link>http://www.killingthemhardly.com/2010/04/trustcorp-truth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.killingthemhardly.com/2010/04/trustcorp-truth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graffiti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guerrilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pranks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killingthemhardly.com/?p=1088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check out this great Flickr set here. Decorating the streets of Los Angeles, Miami and New York City, street artist TrustoCorp adds personality to Metropolitan areas with these hand painted street signs. While all of the signs are amusing, some of them seem to carry a social message, while others come off a bit lighter. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.killingthemhardly.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/game.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1089" title="game" src="http://www.killingthemhardly.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/game.jpg" alt="" width="334" height="500" /></a></p>
<p>Check out this <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/trustocorp/" target="_blank">great Flickr set here.</a> <em>Decorating the streets of Los Angeles, Miami and New York City, street  artist <a href="http://www.trustocorp.com" target="_blank">TrustoCorp</a> adds personality to Metropolitan areas with these hand  painted street signs. While all of the signs are amusing, some of them  seem to carry a social message, while others come off a bit lighter. I  can just imagine a person looking up at one of these signs in confusion,  before breaking out in a great big smile.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.killingthemhardly.com/2010/04/trustcorp-truth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Square Coke Box.</title>
		<link>http://www.killingthemhardly.com/2010/03/square-coke-box/</link>
		<comments>http://www.killingthemhardly.com/2010/03/square-coke-box/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user interface]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killingthemhardly.com/?p=1078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really neat packaging design concepts, apparently from a freshman student.  Good article here.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really neat packaging design concepts, apparently from a freshman student.  <a href="http://www.core77.com/blog/object_culture/andrew_kims_square_coke_bottle_design_16266.asp" target="_blank">Good article here</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.killingthemhardly.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/0andkimcoke01.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1079" title="0andkimcoke01" src="http://www.killingthemhardly.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/0andkimcoke01.jpg" alt="" width="468" height="389" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.killingthemhardly.com/2010/03/square-coke-box/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Power Users Dominate.</title>
		<link>http://www.killingthemhardly.com/2010/03/power-users-dominate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.killingthemhardly.com/2010/03/power-users-dominate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interactive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trend]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killingthemhardly.com/?p=1073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting stats article today on mashable.com about Twitter users&#8217; usage.  I was going to link it up here, but the front-page PopURLs mention crashed mashable.  It basically said something to the effect that only about 21% of users had actually tweeted more than 10 times.  Something like 34% had only tweeted once. I&#8217;m intrigued by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting stats article today on <a href="http://www.mashable.com" target="_blank">mashable.com</a> about Twitter users&#8217; usage.  I was going to link it up here, but the front-page <a href="http://www.popurls.com" target="_blank">PopURLs</a> mention crashed mashable.  It basically said something to the effect that only about 21% of users had actually tweeted more than 10 times.  Something like 34% had only tweeted once. I&#8217;m intrigued by the Twitter phemonemon, but wonder if it will ever reach the mainstream penetration that mediums of the past once did.  Perhaps, perhaps not&#8230;  Will anything, ever again?  Or is this fragmentation, in full view?</p>
<p>Mashable is back up &#8211; <a href="http://mashable.com/2010/03/10/twitter-follow-stats/" target="_blank">here&#8217;s the link</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.killingthemhardly.com/2010/03/power-users-dominate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
